The Myth Called Gender Equality

To say that women are equal to men, is like saying a doctor is equal to an engineer. Yes, both are graduates and professionals, but their functions in the society are different. They should just be proud of what they can and should do, and appreciative of what the other is doing. There is no point in a doctor claiming that he is equal to an engineer and so should be allowed to build a skyscraper, nor in an engineer seeking the privilege to perform a surgery. There were some interesting articles that complained that there aren’t as many takers for women’s cricket as there are for men’s. Of course, if the best of these women’s teams play against the worst of men’s team (at any given level – national or international), it’s not even going to be much of a contest. So the simple fact is that women are not up to men’s level in playing cricket, and so there are few who are interested in watching them play. It has nothing to do with a perceptional bias. If this difference is evident in even something as simple to analyze as a game, then how can we assume equality on a larger scale? I am sure there are other fields in which men are no match for women. This does not make men and women more equal, but adds to the inequality.

Myth of Gender Equality - Apples and oranges are both fruits, and all fruits are equal. But should we be making apple pie with oranges and marmalade with apples? — Apples and oranges are both fruits, and all fruits are equal. But should we be making apple pie with oranges and marmalade with apples?

I have been reading many articles that ascribed crime against women to a perception of this inequality in the society. In my opinion, this is fallacious reasoning. Hurting or abusing another is always a wrong thing to do – whether or not they are equal. For example, whether or not you consider a manager and a worker who reports to him to be equal or not, it is not acceptable for the manager to abuse the worker, or the other way. I don’t think it’s because they are equal or they’re doing the same job in their organization, but just that it is not okay for anybody to hurt anybody else – be it man or animal or plant – physically or emotionally (or in any other way). Why don’t we stop at that, rather than bring in unsustainable and arbitrary points such as equality? Of course, we can discuss and debate on those lines as much as we want, but let’s not allow our opinion on these abstract concepts (such as equality) to cloud our view on something as down-to-earth as crime and punishment.I don’t think anybody is equal to anybody else. What I believe is that we are all in different stages of evolution (of the soul), and at our current level we have certain responsibilities that help us get to the next level if we gladly play our part, and to our best ability. We are all essentially manifestations of the same spirit, equally loved by God, and deserve to be equally treated by the Law. We’re like gold or diamond in different levels of refinement or polishing. But the equality stops there. Yes, men and women are different, and the society needs them in different roles. To understand and accept our weakness is the key to developing our strengths. That is the way we grow. If anybody cannot see this obvious truth, they’re either closing their eyes to it, or actually blind. To accept this difference and celebrate this diversity is vital to solving the gender issues that the world is facing today.

Spread the love

Josh

January 5, 2013 at 7:47 pm

When we talk about gender equality, what we essentially mean is the way men and women are treated by law, and that one is not discriminated in preference to the other. However,it is true as the reality is men and women are much different in their physical and mental makeup. And it is to our society to evolve norms that protect the weaknesses of each kind and celebrate the differences.

Reply
Srikanth

April 30, 2013 at 6:37 am

Everyone should have the opportunity to do whatever he or she wants unconstrained by his or her gender. Gender equality should be about opportunities rather than status. If a man thinks that he could be a great nurse or any other traditional female role he must not be considered less of a man. Similarly a woman should be free to choose whether she wants to be a homemaker or a soldier. But I do agree that for majority the traditional gender roles could be the best choice.

Reply
1. raman
  
  April 30, 2013 at 6:48 am
  
  Yes, I agree that the freedom to choose should be there. But what I feel is that there is a manufactured peer-pressure on women who are homemakers, that their contribution will be valuable only if they pursue a career outside the home. It is such a view that I am against. In my opinion, they're already doing their part by performing in their traditional gender role, and should be under no pressure to earn an income to earn dignity in society. In fact, I believe such peer pressure is a chain which restricts their freedom even more than the expectation of the traditional gender role (Ref: https://ramandivakaran-ltcfa.wpcomstaging.com/2013/04/dispelling-delusion-of-freedom.html)
  
  Thank you for reading and sharing your views!
  
  Reply
Nebuchadnezzar

May 13, 2013 at 4:12 pm

I like the way you've framed your argument, but wouldn't you agree that part of the reason women and men don't do certain things is because they've been conditioned not to? Women's tennis is a great sport. They play well, and it has lots of viewers too. Same for women's hockey, or men doing figure skating. We just have to break those boundaries that prevent people from doing something their gender generally doesn't do. We could celebrate our differences that way too.

Reply
1. raman
  
  May 13, 2013 at 6:02 pm
  
  I definitely agree that there are some women who are exceptionally talented in fields usually associated with men, and they excel irrespective of the conditioning. Same goes for some men. But I believe that rather than conditioning having led to these differences, for the most part, it is inherent differences that led to defining gender roles, which in turn had the effect of conditioning. And I sincerely feel that there's no question of one's role being higher or lower than the other's here, and so there's no reason for women to feel more valued if they do something that is traditionally done by men. At the same time, if they are really good at and passionate about it, I don't think they should feel chained by their traditional roles either. But this, in my opinion, would be a small minority that has always asserted itself and been accepted by the society at all times.
  
  Reply
adi

September 17, 2013 at 4:40 am

Well said. Nice to come across a person who shares my views on this topic.
I think many women (and men) are overzealous feminists because it gives them a sense of identity, and makes them feel good about themselves. They think they are fighting for a noble cause.

Reply
1. raman
  
  September 18, 2013 at 5:13 pm
  
  Glad to meet a like-minded (right-minded, in my opinion!) person 🙂
  
  Reply